Brooke & Jubal In The Morning

Weekdays 6am - 10am on MOViN 92.5

Monday on Brooke & Jubal In The Morning (from 6a-10a)


Help Choose Brooke's Wedding Photo!

Brooke needs your help choosing a PHOTO to use for her wedding invitations! She's narrowed it down to FOUR. Which picture do YOU like the most? Comment Below!

 

PICTURE #1

 

PICTURE #2

 

PICTURE #3

 

PICTURE #4

* Thank you to Barbie Hull Photography for taking all these amazing pictures!



Comments

noe.n.lupe.macias.060209's picture

noe.n.lupe.macias.060209 - Picture #1- just because it shows the couple whole and it is "formal" my second choice was picture #4, then #3  

sparrowmoon1978 - Photo number 3....  even though you can't see faces, it has a certain vintage feel to it, as if it were a photo from the 50's.  And would go wonderfully on a wedding invitation!  

vanessajackson7 - I like the first one and the third one then the second one and then the fourth one.  

RheaVL - I like photo #3!! They're all very cute but #3 has that "wedding feel".  The vintage look lends to the idea of something being timeless- like marriage, like love. :)  

jeremy.hman's picture

jeremy.hman - I like the second PIC because I like both of your smiles in it; however, I just wish the two of you were " closer ".. like holding each other. For wedding PICs, not sure why y'all are so far away from each other.  That being said, for " closeness " ; I would have to pic # 4.  On that one, at least y'all are making physical contact with each other.  Just my two ******* worth... which is like totally worthless in today's economy, BTW.  ;-)  

jeremy.hman's picture

jeremy.hman - I like the second PIC because I like both of your smiles in it; however, I just wish the two of you were " closer ".. like holding each other. For wedding PICs, not sure why y'all are so far away from each other.  That being said, for " closeness " ; I would have to pic # 4.  On that one, at least y'all are making physical contact with each other.  Just my two ******* worth... which is like totally worthless in today's economy, BTW.  ;-)  

jeremy.hman's picture

jeremy.hman - I like the second PIC because I like both of your smiles in it; however, I just wish the two of you were " closer ".. like holding each other. For wedding PICs, not sure why y'all are so far away from each other.  That being said, for " closeness " ; I would have to pic # 4.  On that one, at least y'all are making physical contact with each other.  Just my two ******* worth... which is like totally worthless in today's economy, BTW.  ;-)  

Vanessad - Number one. I sorta like 4 too but prefer a more classic photo.  

Ascheller - #1 for sure!!! :)  

ArleneFox - Ooooh. I like the one one the main page saying to vote, but it's not an option. Otherwise, #1 is my favorite. I think it's lovely to have a more serious photo because all they might see at the parade is smiling and laughing. Barbie Hull is amazing!!!  

VickiKelley - #3.  While all pics are beautiful, #3 has that unique, vintage look.  It looks like it belongs on a card or an invite.  Everyone keeps saying you can't see the faces, but are forgetting these invites are going out to people who know you, they've seen your faces, lol.  #3 is classic, artistic and just belongs on an invite.  :)  

kalierickson - #3! then you can have it open in the middle between your hands!  

CoCo Rodriguez - I chose number 4 as it speaks volumes for your personalities. I am saying it from a place of love and understanding that you should both be in the loonie bin. :)  

jilliancrosier - Picture #3  

BigJ - Love #4.....so different from any other wedding invite and it just makes me so darn happy!  

lilashley85 - #3 definitly  

briecv - I think it depends on what kind of wedding they are having. These are four very differnet types of images, so which ever one best fits the initial tone she wants to set for the of the wedding, or theme she will be following. If its a formal, traditional affair Id go with #1, if its a fun out of the box wedding I'd go with #4, and if it's a retro themed wedding I'd suggest #3.  

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments